Вернуться к Блогу
Сравнения

AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG 2026: Главное Противостояние [Тест]

Сравнение AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG: размер, качество, скорость. AVIF побеждает с файлами на 50% меньше →

2 февраля 202511 мин чтения
AVIF vs WebP vs JPEG 2026: Главное Противостояние [Тест] - AVIF.expert

Format Overview

Understanding each format's heritage and design goals provides context for their differences.

  • JPEG (1992): The original web image format. Ubiquitous support, good lossy compression, but showing its age against modern alternatives.
  • WebP (2010): Google's answer to aging formats. Better compression than JPEG, transparency support, animations. Mature and widely supported.
  • AVIF (2019): Latest generation using AV1 codec. Best compression, HDR support, but newest with still-expanding tooling.

Compression Analysis

Compression efficiency directly impacts page load times and bandwidth costs.

AVIF consistently achieves the smallest file sizes at equivalent visual quality. This advantage compounds at scale—a site with 100 images might save 5-10MB per page load compared to JPEG.

The encoding speed difference matters for dynamic image processing but is irrelevant for pre-processed static assets. For most web applications, the smaller file sizes justify longer build times.

Formatvs JPEG SizeEncoding SpeedDecoding Speed
JPEGBaselineVery FastVery Fast
WebP25-35% smallerFastFast
AVIF50-70% smallerSlowFast

Quality Comparison

Visual quality at equivalent file sizes reveals each format's efficiency.

At low bitrates (high compression), AVIF maintains significantly better quality than both WebP and JPEG. This makes AVIF particularly valuable for thumbnails and heavily compressed images where JPEG would show obvious artifacts.

At higher quality settings, differences become subtle. For quality 90+, most users cannot distinguish between formats. AVIF's advantage is achieving acceptable quality at much smaller file sizes.

💡 Совет Профессионала

Run your own tests with representative images. The optimal format may vary based on your specific content type.

Practical Recommendations

Clear guidance for choosing between these formats.

  • New Projects: Use AVIF as primary format with WebP and JPEG fallbacks. You get best compression for 95%+ of users.
  • Existing Sites: Add AVIF support incrementally. High-traffic pages and large images provide the best ROI for conversion effort.
  • Legacy Support Required: WebP is the safe middle ground—better than JPEG, broader support than AVIF.
  • Maximum Compatibility: JPEG remains the only format guaranteed to work everywhere. Use as final fallback.

Часто Задаваемые Вопросы

Should I stop using JPEG entirely?
No, JPEG remains valuable as a fallback format. Approximately 5% of browsers don't support AVIF or WebP.
Is WebP still relevant?
Yes, WebP has broader support than AVIF and better compression than JPEG. It's an excellent middle-ground format.
Which format for email images?
JPEG, unfortunately. Email client support for modern formats is poor. Optimize JPEG quality instead.

Готовы Конвертировать Изображения?

Попробуйте наш бесплатный конвертер AVIF - загрузка не требуется, 100% приватно.

Начать Конвертацию

Связанные Статьи